Print
Hide
Add to bookmarks
Remove from bookmarks
Print

showing support opposite overcalls 1 or 1♠

La paire Nord-Sud a déclaré un très mauvais contrat. Comme souvent, chacun des deux joueurs pense que son partenaire est responsable de l’accident.
Et vous, qu’en pensez-vous ?

This month we will be looking at: 
showing support opposite overcalls 1
 or 1.

Easy
Average
Difficult
Problem 1

Support bids without a jump at the 2-level

All Vul.

WNES
11♠Pass2
Pass2♠

The facts
Since West has shown opening strength, there is a high probability of taking ten or eleven tricks in a Spade contract. This game contract with 24HCP must be reached. Who is responsible for this accident?

Arguments
North: “You asked me for more details about my shape. When I repeat my Spades without a jump to 3♠, you can deduce that I have a regular hand. I did not think that after an unlimited cue-bid, you were allowed to pass 2♠.»

South: “As you can overcall 1♠ with as little as 9HCP, I could be in danger at the 3-level. We play that the cue-bid promises a fit. You have 14HCP and I promised at least 11 total points. You must simply jump to 4♠.»

This article is reserved for BRIDGERAMA+ subscribers.

Share this post
Avatar photo
Alain Lévy

A renowned bridge author and player, he was born in Casablanca on 14th July 1949. He has earned three World Champion titles as a member of the French Open team and has also won countless national titles. He writes articles about leading in bridge for Bridgerama+, as well as Figaro Magazine. He mainly provides analysis of his own games on the blog. Picture © Caroline Moreau.

Articles: 120

Leave a Reply

MAG

Contents