Response to a (Multi) intervention over a 1NT opening
North-South have reached a very poor contract. As so often, each of the two players considers that his partner is responsible for the accident. And you, what do you think?
This month we will be looking at:
Response to a (Multi) intervention over a 1NT opening.
Problem 1
| W | N | E | S |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1NT | Dble(*) | passe | 2♣ |
The facts
There are potentially eleven tricks, with Clubs or Spades as trumps: our two young competitors did neither make the most of their cards nor learn their lesson well. Who is responsible for this accident?
Arguments
North: “We have just learned about this minor-major Double and the almost automatic response of 2♣, meaning ‘Pass or correct’. I am not really sure what that means! I’m aware I had a great hand, maybe I should have said 2♠ over 2♣.”
South: “I did think about responding 2♥ to let you choose between the two majors, but I didn’t know whether that would show both majors or a one-suiter in Hearts. I’ve also heard that you can use 2♦ as a relay with both majors, another famous “Pass or Correct” that I didn’t understand any more than you!”
This article is reserved for BRIDGERAMA+ subscribers.
Subscribe to access all our articles
